For business owners, investors, and advisors looking to lower their cost of capital. Subscribe for delivery straight to your inbox ๐
Taxes and Operating Agreements - Everything You Ever Wanted ๐คฒ
|
Having the pain threshold to read an Operating Agreement (or LLC Agreement, or Partnership Agreement - same thing) is a powerful tool. But knowing what's missing from the agreement is where you can provide incredible value to your investors, clients, or yourself. Today, we're going into one of my favorite topics - the Operating Agreement (OA)'s impact on the tax return. I'll cover some commonly misused terms, misapplied terms, and missing terms. ๐ตโ๐ซ
๐จ But before we go on - time to pay for this newsletter ๐จ
โ
If you sign e-file approvals (as a client) or prepare partnership tax returns (CPA or preparer) and are not comfortable with the below terms, I offer consulting to help. For $2,500, I review up to 3 Operating Agreements and 5 Tax Returns to see if they are matching. I'll provide a summary 1-2 pager with findings and sample language to provide to an attorney as an example (**I'm not an attorney** ). Think of it as cheap insurance against breach of contract for K1s not matching the OA.
โ
If this is something you'd be interested in, reply to this email ๐ค and I'll get you in the queue - this is first come first served.
โ
Here is a snippet out of a sample report:
โ
If you don't need it - all good. Enjoy the alpha below! ๐ช
Allocation LanguageIf you're read my stuff for long, you knew this was coming. There are three types of allocation language that can be included in an OA for a partnership. And assuming it is followed by the preparer, can have significantly different impacts on the tax return and K1s. ๐
To know which type of language should be in the OA, you need to look at what investors or LPs were told - which would be in the Offering Memorandum or similar. What the LPs were promised should drive the OA language which in turn drives the tax returns and K1s. When we inherit tax return work, probably 50-60% of them are done incorrectly - thus the offering above. Preferred Return LanguageThis can be a nasty little surprise. ๐ชค When the OA defines Preferred Returns, it may or may not make reference to available income of the partnership. In short, if the preferred return is paid out contingent on income of the partnership, that preferred return is usually treated as an allocation of income. Duh - but read on. If, instead, the preferred return language has no regard for available income of the partnership then that preferred return distribution is likely a "guaranteed payment" to the receiving partner. Guaranteed payments are deductions to the partnership (like interest expense) and are self-employment income to the receiving partner - creating a nasty little mismatch of income types. ๐ We see guaranteed payment treatment commonly done in larger deals with target capital allocations. But every OA should be read and sponsors warned before sending those K1s out - speaking from experience. Profits Interest Safe HarborFor my tax heads - Rev Proc 93-27. This is what gives some good safe harbor language for what the IRS will accept as profits interest. ๐ค For my non-tax heads - the beauty of a profits interest is that it's non-taxable when granted (hopefully). But if not done right, it can create a tax liability to the recipient as it's perceived as a grant of full participating equity. The blurb that matters - the IRS will not treat a grant of a profits interest as taxable, except, "If the profits interest relates to a substantially certain and predictable stream of income from partnership assets, such as income from high-quality debt securities or a high-quality net lease." The profits interest definition section in the OA could be helped along by explicitly covering this issue. Minimum Gain and ChargebackPartnerships that hold real estate subject to a mortgage should almost always have this language - it compliments qualified non-recourse debt to allow partners to technically go negative in their capital account. In layman's terms, that means the partner gets losses allocated to him (or distributions) in excess of his cash contributed WITHOUT paying taxes on it or being limited by basis. ๐ป Minimum Gain is like "pre-gain" that is the difference between the adjusted book basis (cost - depreciation) and the mortgage on that property. This pre-gain is allocated to partners under the premise that even if the property is handed over to the bank - the sales price would be the debt amount and the gain recognized would be the debt less the adjusted basis of the property given up. So partners get credit for that amount. But this also requires chargeback rules - such that if debt is decreased in future years, the partners who have received this minimum gain allocation pick up income to not throw off the basis rules. โช Deferred Acquisition FeesAn example helps illustrate this best ๐ GP and LP investors are buying a $1 million property ($300k equity, $700k debt)
โ
GP is required to co-invest $30,000 - and LPs are contributing $270,000.
โ
As a part of the purchase, GP is owed an "acquisition fee" of 3% of the property - or $30,000.
โ
Under standard procedure, GP's S-Corp would pick up $30,000 of acquisition fee income and then GP would turn around and invest that same $30,000 into the property - trading income for an asset.
This creates tax inefficiency - especially at scale (10X or 30X those numbers). So we have previously advised other GPs to include a clause in the OA to allow them to grant approximately equivalent additional units of profits interest while foregoing the acquisition fee. This optionality does not harm the LPs and increases tax rate efficiency while deferring income recognition. ๐ Tax DistributionsA lot of minority partners get squeezed out of positions by majority partners with this missing clause. Majority partners often can determine the distribution amounts (if at all) regardless of income allocated. So partners who are not in control can get left with a serious tax burden. A tax distribution paragraph in the OA helps this situation by calling for distributions to be made at the highest marginal tax rates of the class of partners who have been allocated income. Unreimbursed Partner ExpensesUnreimbursed Partner Expenses (UPE) are an especially useful tool at the partner level. UPE allows a partner to deduct against his K1 income, expenses related to that activity that have not been and will not be reimbursed. For example:
The trick is that these types of expenses should be spelled out in the OA as not eligible for reimbursement - granting the partner the right to do so on their personal return against the income. President Trump famously had something like $27 million of UPE that the IRS gave up on tracking down through various OAs so they just allowed the deductions. ๐คฆ Bonus Round - S-CorpsThis is short and sweet. When you have an LLC agreement and convert to an S-Corp, you need to tighten up language to REMOVE partnership references, or language about capital accounts or non pro-rata distributions. ๐ โโ๏ธ It can turn your S-Corp to a C-Corp - which is a doomsday scenario. โ Every year I read hundreds of OAs and enjoy doing so. Hope this helped spread the love of what I've learned so far. And remember, if you need help analyzing your OA and returns - I'm here for you ๐ซ ๐ซก ๐ฅ Hottest Finance Posts This Week ๐ฅ
โ Want to read previous issues? Click here.โ |
The Plug [Newsletter]
For business owners, investors, and advisors looking to lower their cost of capital. Subscribe for delivery straight to your inbox ๐
"Life get's complicated when you use other people's money to make money." Today, we're jamming on a wrinkle that tax preparers will often come across in real estate - using a Tenancy in Common (TIC) structure to keep a ยง1031 like-kind exchange in tact. ๐๏ธ โก๏ธ ๐ I've done another post on TICs and their restrictions previously here - so today will be more theory. What's a TIC The best way to think about a TIC is that's it's like a Joint Venture (JV) for real estate. ๐ค They are a workaround to a...
There are a handful of areas in the tax world that business owners usually push the envelope on. One of them is "what states do we have to file in?" And while the answer isn't always clear at first, it is pretty black and white with enough research. ๐ท This same bent usually also gets applied to indirect taxes - like sales tax, use tax, and excise tax. While growing, business owners want to file in as little jurisdictions and pay as little indirect tax as possible - even if it means they're in...
"You will spend your 50s and 60s unwinding what you set-up in your 30s and 40s" - or so goes the popular tax adage. ๐งต Peaking in earning too young has a way of making you paranoid of tax. The aggressiveness that brings early success will often bleed into tax structuring - being willing to take positions to mitigate as much tax as possible. And many (often good) advisors and attorneys won't warn you against these structures because they're lucrative for them too. So you get a whole lot of...