"My Equity Got Wiped Out. Why Do I Owe Tax?"



If investors know one thing it's how much cash they contributed ๐Ÿ’ธ and what they've received in return. ๐Ÿซด

Loss allocated to them over the years? Nah.

Capital gain treatment vs. ordinary income? CPA jargon.

Debt basis coded as qualified nonrecourse for at-risk? Nerd stuff.

But those are pretty important distinctions that drive whether the money they receive as a distribution is actually taxable - and if taxable, at what rates.

GPs think in terms of (1) returning capital, and (2) paying off pref(erred returns).

Tax-smart advisors work to explain and integrate ๐Ÿค the three points of view (investor, GP, tax) into a practical explanation - which is what we'll do today.

The Basics

Let's start with the alpha. Here's a quick table to help explain common disconnects:

Distributions can take many different forms - from operations (income), preferred returns, refinance proceeds, returns of capital, and sales proceeds.

The Drivers of Tax Impacts

Tax pros are looking at three things to determine if the investor will owe tax on that distribution:

  1. Underlying partnership activity - does the partnership show net taxable income or loss?
  2. Partners individual basis - what is the partners capital account (contributions + history to date income - history to date loss - history to date distributions) + their allocated debt?
  3. The Operating Agreement - what are the terms used to describe the preferred returns?

A few examples to illustrate:

  • Example 1 - In year 1, if the partnership performs a cost segregation study, there will be losses allocated to partners. If there are also distributions made, then those distributions will be tax-free return of capital. And the losses allocated will also reduce the partners capital account (and therefore basis in the partnership).
  • Example 2 - After the property is stabilized, if a refinance is performed (assume guaranties removed) and proceeds are distributed to partners, those distributions aren't automatically taxable. But if the partnership shows net operating income (since it's stabilized), the partners may have income allocated to them - though much less than the refinance distribution.
  • Example 3 - In early years, if a higher class of equity is receiving preferred returns "regardless of income of the partnership," (language usually in the Operating Agreement) then those distributions would be taxed as guaranteed payments regardless of if the partnership had taxable income or loss.

Year of Sale - "My Equity Was Wiped Out, Why Is There Gain?!"

This is one of the most common questions โ“โ“โ“ we get when preparing returns during sale years - especially for properties that underperformed.

The question usually comes with a very accurate record of (1) how much cash he contributed, and (2) how much cash he received back. If the investor received back as distributions less than their contribution, they expect a loss not a gain.

Welcome to the wonderful world of pass-through taxation. ๐Ÿค—

The usual culprit is losses incurred over the life of the partnership and allocated to them in previous year. Especially if a cost segregation study was performed.

These losses lower their capital account and basis in the partnership - many times well below the original contribution amount. So when the tax man cometh, the math shakes out to there being income on even a "loss" of a deal.

The silver lining is that many investors can have these "phantom gains" shielded by previously suspended passive losses from this same property. But if they previously used those losses allocated to them, then it is what it is.

The Takeaway

Your LPs will remember two numbers: what they put in and what they got back. They won't remember the cost seg losses that cratered their basis in year one. They won't remember the guaranteed payment language buried in Section 4.3 of the operating agreement. They won't remember that the refinance proceeds hit their account the same year the property flipped to net income.

But they will remember whether you had answers when the K-1 showed gain on a deal they lost money on. The allocator who can walk them through that conversation clearly, before they have to ask, is the one who keeps their trust.

๐Ÿซก


Meme Cleanser ๐Ÿงผ


Enjoying The Plug?

Help it grow ๐Ÿ‘‰

๐Ÿ”Œ Forward this on to a friend, colleague, or client

๐Ÿ”Œ Check out more purely tax alpha follow me on X @rledbettercpa or check out my website baldridgeledbetter.com โ€‹

๐Ÿ”Œ Reply to this email to set-up a paid consultation re: tax, accounting, or firm management

๐Ÿ”Œ Reply to the poll below, or email me and let me know what you thought ๐Ÿ‘‡

Want to read previous issues? Click here.โ€‹

The Plug [Newsletter]

I've been a CPA for nearly 20 years - serving private small business and real estate the entire time. I take the lessons learned in serving and now running a small business and share them here. For business owners, investors, and advisors looking to lower their cost of capital, subscribe for delivery straight to your inbox ๐Ÿ‘‡ Also on YouTube at PlugAccountingandTax!

Read more from The Plug [Newsletter]

IRC ยง267 disallows losses on sales between related parties. ๐Ÿ‘ช For older clients sitting on lower value real estate and corresponding capital losses they will never use, ยง267 has a quieter feature that can move real money to the next generation. This is especially interesting for those subject to estate tax (estate values > $30 million). ๐Ÿฆ The feature is the "ยง267(d) offset." When a related-party loss is disallowed, it does not vanish. ๐Ÿ’จ It attaches to the property in the buyer's hands. If the...

If you own a business with at least one other person, you have a document that governs how your business runs. Operating Agreement, Partnership Agreement, Shareholder Agreement - all driving the same things: Who can make decisions What happens when things go bad Who gets money when there is money to distribute How does it all get wound up For too many small businesses and real estate GPs, the agreement comes from their attorney and the attorney focuses on the things they're good at - risk....

Tax is hard. Making money doing taxes for others is even harder. That's usually the main driver for the mistakes I find on returns I look at for prospects. Most CPAs understand these basic things, like what we're talking about today - Basis, but they're trying to run a business. And quality is very difficult to scale. So how can you spot check the K1s you get (or prepare) on a partnership return? And what happens if you get it wrong? Glad you asked. ๐Ÿค Why Basis Matters Basis in a partnership...