Interest Expense - Tracing Rules and Business Impacts



Interest expense is a part of life for nearly everyone. Unless you're a die hard Dave Ramsey (no hate here) ๐Ÿ‘ด๐Ÿป, you likely pay interest expense on your mortgage ๐Ÿก, credit cards ๐Ÿ’ณ, and auto loans ๐Ÿš—. And it's no less prevalent in business.

Prior to 1986, all interest expense paid was generally deductible by everyone - people and businesses. Which, if you've ever looked at an interest rate chart for the 1980s, you'd see why this became a serious revenue raising opportunity for the IRS ๐Ÿ‘‡

Cue the Interest Tracing Rules that were included in the massive overhaul of the tax code in 1986. ๐Ÿ’ฃ Today we're going to run through a couple of points on how those changes impact us today:

  • Why Interest Expense is targeted? ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ
  • Interest Tracing rules in general ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿป
  • Two ways it impacts SMB tax โœŒ๏ธ

Let's dig in.

โ€‹

Why Interest Expense gets targeted?

From a tax perspective, interest expense is unique. It's an ongoing finance charge that, at least until 1986, was treated differently than the underlying purpose for the interest expense.

An example - if I want to buy a boat (I don't) โ›ต to use on family vacations, I cannot deduct the cost of that boat. But under the pre-1986 rules, the interest expense I'd be paying to "own" the boat would be deductible - effectively side-stepping the non-deductibility of the personal use asset.

It then can get pretty slippery ๐Ÿงผ to do creative tax planning - selling a $10,000 boat (no idea what they cost - sorry boat people) for $1 but interest payments totaling $9,999. This is an extreme example, but it proves the point of the unique opportunity interest represents and why Congress cares so much about how it's used.

โ€‹

Interest Tracing Rules in general

Interest tracing rules came into play to limit another type of abuse that was happening. Taxpayers were taking out loans on appreciated property ๐Ÿฆ, using those loan proceeds to buy other non-related assets ๐ŸŽ๏ธ, and fully deducting the interest that was related to the loans on the unappreciated property.

Another example - I own an apartment building that has substantially appreciated (I don't). I want to use "tax-free" loans to pay for my boat instead of taking out a personal loan for it. Since I can't deduct the interest on my personal tax return, I'll be able to deduct the interest on the business return for the apartment complex, right? Nope.

Interest tracing requires the borrower to "follow the use of the loan proceeds" to determine the character of the deduction - versus using the collateral of the borrowing to determine if it can be deducted. ๐Ÿ”

In our apartment example, the distribution I took out from the refinance would require special reporting on the subsequent interest expense the business would pay on that refinance (I'll get into this more below) - requiring me to acknowledge that I used those proceeds for personal consumption and therefore the interest is not deductible. ๐Ÿ˜ง

In general, this tracing of interest expense can convert it's character from a business expense to:

  • Investment interest expense (if used to buy investments) ๐Ÿ“ˆ
  • Additional business interest expense (if used in another business) ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ
  • Home mortgage interest expense (if used to pay off my mortgage) ๐Ÿ 
  • Nondeductible interest expense (if used to buy that boat after all) ๐Ÿšค

It's worth noting that documentation is key here. Keep good records of what loan proceeds taken out against appreciated assets are for - especially when it's going from a normally deductible expense (business) to questionable use (personal-ish).

โ€‹

How Interest Rules Hit SMB

Two ways I want to cover for how small business taxpayers get impacted here:

  1. Debt-financed Distributions
  2. 163j Limitation

Okay, so the first one is more of a real estate impact but it can still happen in small business. This is what was alluded to above in the apartment example. When distributions are made to partners that were financed with new debt, a calculation must be done and the amount of interest expense related to the distributed debt is reported separately (another Box 13 slush amount ๐Ÿฅค). The recipient partner (or his unwitting CPA ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ผ) then works to determine whether that interest is deductible based on what the distribution was used for.

In reality, I'd estimate 75% of K1s are missing this disclosure that I've seen. And on the ones we send out that have this, I'd estimate 90% of CPAs don't ask the question. It's tricky, but those are the rules. ๐Ÿ˜ญ

Second, and 10x worse than Debt-financed distributions, is the new 163j limitation rules that hit in 2017. In short, this was a way that Congress helped pay for some of the 2017 tax cuts. This law limits the amount of interest a business can deduct to 30% of pre-interest income (the calculation is more complicated, but let's not do that now). ๐Ÿซจ

But that 30% limitation didn't kick in until revenue crossed $30MM (technically gross receipts on an average 3 years, but again, stay with me). As such, many small businesses ignored and are still ignoring it. But there was a catch. ๐ŸŽฃ

If your business is running a loss and is allocating 35% or more of that loss to "passive investors" then your business is a "tax shelter" and is now subject to this limitation regardless of revenue size. ๐Ÿคฏ This crushes real estate that runs losses, has a high amount of "passive investors" and is usually leveraged up.

It's worth noting that there is an election for rental real estate to deduct interest still with some trade-offs. โš–๏ธ But I can't tell you how many times I still see this missed and / or done wrong.

โ€‹

Okay, let's land the plane. ๐Ÿ›ฌ Interest expense is a unique deduction for taxpayers and businesses. It requires careful tracking and documentation to support the deduction. And for small business and real estate groups it be especially tricky to continue to be able to deduct the interest paid entirely.

Remember to always consult with a professional - I'm no attorney and every situation is unique.

๐Ÿซก


๐Ÿ”” Reminder that I offer one-off paid consultations. Reply to this email to set up a call. ๐Ÿ””

โ€‹

๐Ÿšจ๐ŸšจHave a Question - send a reply directly to this email and I'll answer it in upcoming emails ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ

Have an idea for a newsletter? Would love to hear from you. Want a deeper dive on anything above? Let me know!

Want to read previous issues? Click here.โ€‹

If you enjoyed this, please forward on to a friend and let me know on X / Twitter.

The Plug: Tax & Accounting for Real Estate and Small Business

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ Weekly emails ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Accounting Basics ๐Ÿ’ฐ Tax Strategy and Structuring Basics ๐Ÿ™‡ Internal Controls for Small Business ๐Ÿญ Lessons learned as a partner and running CPA Firms

Read more from The Plug: Tax & Accounting for Real Estate and Small Business

Today we will be taking a pretty deep dive into an ownership structure common in real estate - the Tenancy in Common, or TIC. ๐Ÿข This may be overly deep if you don't care about real estate tax structuring - but it's exactly the thing I nerd out ๐Ÿฅธ about and enjoy so it's what you get today! Below, we'll talk about: What a TIC is and how it's used ๐Ÿคทโ™‚๏ธ What are the (lesser-known) rules to run a TIC for tax compliance ๐Ÿ”– What does tax filing look like for TIC and TIC owners ๐Ÿ“„ ๐Ÿšจ Before we dive too...

Every Cash Flow Statement I've seen from an accounting software sucks (looking at you, QBO)๐Ÿ˜ฟ. It's a shame because the Statement of Cash Flows (SCF) is one of the most practical financial statements to really understand the health of a business. ๐Ÿฉบ If you read the breakdowns of the downfall of Enron, the SCF and related party disclosures were throwing red flags ๐Ÿšฉ years before it all came down. So what is the SCF and how can you use it? Let's dig in ๐Ÿ‘‡ I created the meme above to demonstrate how...

๐ŸŽง Before we jump in - be sure to listen to Today in Tax Court: Gregory v. Helvering. It's the newest episode and I cover this landmark case on entity structure and business purpose doctrine. ๐ŸŽง Episode 6 - Gregory v. Helve... Jan 9 ยท Today in Tax Court 24:28 If you've been following me for a while, you'll know I preach that a core input of entity selection is what the balance sheet will look like. In general, you do not put appreciating assets in a S-Corp without very good reason. ๐Ÿ™…โ™‚๏ธ That...